Final Words

It’s really not difficult to come to a conclusion on the iPhone SE. It’s clearly the best 4-inch smartphone on the market, and you can ignore all of the specs when making that assessment because it achieves that by virtue of being the only offering at this size. For the sake of comparison, you can take a look at some Android devices that are larger than the SE, but smaller than your average Android smartphone.

As I said earlier in the review, Android manufacturers have essentially given up on making small smartphones, and most of them haven’t actually made a top tier smartphone at the 4-inch size in about four years. By 2012 things had moved to 4.5 inches or more, with Samsung also introducing the original 5.3-inch Galaxy Note near the end of 2011. Today’s idea of a compact Android phone is something like the Xperia Z5 compact, where the screen has a size of 4.6 inches, which is just a bit smaller than the screen on the iPhone 6s. Getting an even smaller screen means moving to truly low end smartphones like the Moto E, and at that point you’re discussing two entirely different parts of the market.

Even when you consider the smallest high-end devices from the Android manufacturers, it’s not hard to see that the iPhone SE comes out on top. Apple’s A9 SoC is still one of the fastest chips you’ll find in a smartphone, and it goes without saying that the Snapdragon 810 SoC in a smartphone like the Xperia Z5 Compact really isn’t comparable in the slightest. Based on my experience, the camera is also unmatched at this size and price. It’s certainly a step behind the best Android phones and the iPhone 6s Plus, but bringing the sensor from the iPhone 6s to the SE allows for some really great photos, and the best 4K recording video you’ll get on a phone.

The 4-inch IPS display on the iPhone SE has great calibration, and in general the resolution is sufficient to avoid aliasing, although it’s obviously not as sharp as what you’ll get on many Android smartphones. My main complaint about the display is the low contrast ratio and high black level, which is definitely noticeable in real-world use when you compare to more modern LCD displays or any AMOLED panel. Apple definitely intends to keep this phone around for at least a couple of years, if not three, and it’s not going to take remotely that long for the SE’s display to fall quite a few steps behind the market. As far as future-proofing goes, the display is probably the iPhone SE’s one weak spot, although right now it’s still a nice IPS display.

Finally, we have the design of the phone. It’s really unchanged from the iPhone 5s, and some may consider that a bad thing, but I think it’s a good thing. The design still holds up, and there’s absolutely no reason to arbitrarily redesign a product every cycle. The products that are used as examples of good design are often ones that have kept the same design for many years, and in some cases many decades. I can definitely understand those who wanted a device that was more like a small iPhone 6s, but for me the aesthetics of the iPhone 5 era design come out ahead.

Ultimately, the iPhone SE is the upgrade that Apple’s 4-inch iPhone has needed for a while. Considering that it’s been over two years, it’d be hard to not improve, but the fact that you get the same performance, camera, and display calibration as the iPhone 6s is quite appealing when the phone costs $250 less. Battery life is better or worse than the 6s depending on the situation, but it’s definitely improved overall from the 5s. Faster LTE and much faster WiFi are nice improvements too, and you also have Apple Pay thrown in. There’s not much more than Apple could have included without further cutting into their margins and making it really hard to explain why the 6s is significantly more expensive. Even with the things you lose out on, I still find myself asking whether the 6s is truly worth that $250 premium.

While I’ve used the iPhone SE as my daily driver for a month, I expect that I’ll be going back to the Nexus 5X and iPhone 6s. The smaller display is just not for me, but when Apple can sell thirty million two-year-old 4-inch smartphones in a year there’s clearly demand for a smaller smartphone with high end specs. The iPhone SE delivers that, and I think users who have been holding on to an iPhone 5 or 5s should seriously consider it, because it’s the phone that they’ve been waiting for.

Experience: Going Back To 4 Inches
Comments Locked

138 Comments

View All Comments

  • michael2k - Tuesday, May 17, 2016 - link

    What exactly did you want to see? S7 is slightly slower than the iPhone SE in CPU, slower NAND, slightly faster in GPU offscreen, slightly slower in GPU onscreen (due to larger and higher resolution screen), several hundred dollars more, and about the same battery life.
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/10120/the-samsung-ga...
  • Che - Wednesday, May 18, 2016 - link

    I want to read reviews for the various android phones released this year. I am not in the market for an iPhone, personal preference.

    I think you missed my point.
  • michael2k - Friday, May 20, 2016 - link

    I did, sorry. When you said 'lack of review of Galaxy S7' I had misinterpreted your comment as a complaint that they didn't compare the SE to the S7.
  • jav_eee - Tuesday, May 17, 2016 - link

    The only part I disagree with is where you mention that the 6 feels better in the hand. I don't think it does. It is much too slippery. The 5 was perfect.
  • Silvio6 - Tuesday, May 17, 2016 - link

    This looks like the benchmarks were extracted from a tool, and not realy real-life tests. For example, i was told the fingerprint sensor was slower than the one from the 6 and 6s. How much slower ? The one in the 6 is acceptable, but i wish there was the one in the 6s. There is no mention of it in the tests, and this is something anyone would be confronted to multiple times a day.
  • bodonnell - Wednesday, May 18, 2016 - link

    It is slower than the 6s, but at worst it should perform similar to Touch ID in the 6 as both use the 1st gen sensor. In practice it may be slightly faster than the 6 as the A9 chip processes the unlock faster than the A8 in the 6.
  • heartinpiece - Tuesday, May 17, 2016 - link

    For the NAND tests are the read/writes to NAND encrypted?
    I'm guessing some of the other compared devices are not encrypted... Could you elaborate, or distinguish the encrypted from unencrypted devices?
  • Brandon Chester - Tuesday, May 17, 2016 - link

    In mobile if a device is encrypted then you're usually stuck with that, so I don't see any point in differentiating. In the end we're still comparing devices as they work within the limitations of their hardware and software, not the hardware components individually.
  • gochichi - Wednesday, May 18, 2016 - link

    I'm really happy with the Nexus 5X, including the great price, camera, 32GB option, etc. I'm a happy camper.
  • Nick Arthur - Wednesday, May 18, 2016 - link

    It seems a transitional version between 5 and 6 but combines some advantages of the two version together. The price is much cheaper, exactly.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now