GeForce Go 6800 Ultra: Powering the Dell Inspirion XPS Gen 2
by Derek Wilson on February 24, 2005 3:04 PM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Unreal Tournament 2004
Unfortunately, Unreal is very limited by the 2.13GHz Dothan. Performance without AA/AF was steady at about 57 frames per second. We even saw 57fps at 1920x1200 (the system's native resolution) with no AA/AF. And yes, we triple checked the vsync and UT2004.ini settings.Enabling AA/AF dropped performance only at higher resolutions as well. We even saw playable frame rates at 1920x1200 with AA/AF (about 40 frames per second).
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
48 Comments
View All Comments
abakshi - Friday, February 25, 2005 - link
A comparison is not quite possible given all the variables involved, so though the Go 6800U may be fast, we can't really say much about it versus ATI's current X800 mobile offerings until there's a test with identical specs -- the best case being a modular setup to accept either option.sleepeeg3 - Friday, February 25, 2005 - link
Regardless of specs, that thing would still cost nearly twice as much as my top of the line SFF and you'd sacrifice on hard drive space/speeds. There's just no point to a gaming laptop *shrug*. At least those specs are finally starting getting me to look at them! Now if only the price would come down about a grand...timmiser - Friday, February 25, 2005 - link
Exactly #35. I know the Ultra will be faster but I'd like to see exactly how much faster in a graph in order to make a decision if I think I should go out and buy a new DTR.Optimummind - Friday, February 25, 2005 - link
timmiser, I think you need to see graphs and numbers to know that this Geforce Go 6800 Ultra will totally put the 9800 Pro Mobility on its knees. :)timmiser - Friday, February 25, 2005 - link
I have to agree with #22, I am an owner of a Dell XPS system with mobiliy 9800. Until now, the 9800 (Really X800 based) is the fastest available mobile solution and it would have been nice to see some comparisons with the 9800. (Didn't AT do some benches on the 9800??)I still have no idea how my system compares with this new graphic option.
-Tim
mickyb - Friday, February 25, 2005 - link
#30 There are not too many variables to say it is fast. This test shows that it IS fast, especially for a DTR laptop.I think what you are trying to express is that there is not enough information to determine it is the fastest. It does not matter if the new drivers make the other cards go faster.
ElFenix - Friday, February 25, 2005 - link
#26what part of "Creative Audigy 2NX External USB [add $100 or $3/month1] Product details" do you not understand?
or maybe you could go here:
http://www.soundblaster.com/products/audigy2NX/
and see that yes, this really is an external unit.
L3p3rM355i4h - Friday, February 25, 2005 - link
#26, if you've seen the review that anandtech did on desktop use of the dothan core, you would know that it is actually pretty weak when it comes to gaming. It still uses the exectution core of the PIII, etc. Pairing it with DDR2 seems to break the bandwidth issue.Packing that much performance in to a >10lbs package is simply amazing. That machine pwns my A64. when I win the lottery I just might have to pick one up...
Da DvD - Friday, February 25, 2005 - link
I'm sorry to say, but IMO this test is simply invalid. There are too many variables to draw any conclusion but that this thing is quite fast.I guess the newer nVidia drivers support the new render mode in Far Cry patch 1.3 much better than the old drivers did. That would explain the Go being faster here.
Hikari - Friday, February 25, 2005 - link
#28 256MB video card.http://www1.us.dell.com/content/products/productde...
And lowest base memory for the notebook itself is 512.