G.Skill Trident Z5 Memory (F5-6000U3636E16G)

2x16GB of DDR5-6000 CL36

For the purposes of this article and to investigate scaling performance on Alder Lake, G.Skill supplied us with a kit of its latest Trident Z5 DDR5-6000 CL36 memory. The G.Skill Trident Z series has been its flagship model for many years, focusing on performance but blending in a premium and clean-cut aesthetic. G.Skill offers two types of its Trident Z5 memory, some without RGB LEDs such as the kit we are taking a look at today (Z5), and the Trident Z5 RGB, which includes an RGB LED light bar along the top of each memory stick.

Focusing on the non-RGB variants, the G.Skill Trident Z D5 is available in various 32 GB (2x16) configurations starting at DDR5-5600 CL36 and ranging up to DDR5-6000 CL36. G.Skill unveiled a kit of Trident Z D5 RGB DDR5-7000 CL40 kit, which is extremely fast, and when it is released, it will ultimately be one of the most, if not the most, expensive DDR5 memory kit on the market.

Looking at the design, the G.Skill Trident Z5 DDR5 memory uses a 42 mm tall (at the highest point) heatsink, with G.Skill offering a two-tone contrasting matte black kit, as well as a black and metallic silver kit. The kit supplied to us by G.Skill uses two-tone matte black heatsinks. The heatsinks are constructed from aluminum, and G.Skill states that it uses a newer and more 'streamlined' design. There are quite pointy, which given previous G.Skill memory kits might have the tendency to feel too sharp when installing them.

Looking at what CPU-Z is reporting, we can see that the X.M.P 3.0 profile matches up with the advertised specifications, with this particular kit using DDR5-6000 with latency timings of 36-36-36-76. The operating voltage for the kit is 1.3 V, which is a 0.2 V bump from the JEDEC SPD rating of this kit, which is DDR5-4800 at 1.1 V.

Checking the more intricate details of the G.Skill Trident Z5 DDR5-6000 memory, CPU-Z reports that the kit is using Samsung IC's, with a 1Rx8 array of 16 Gb ICs employed on each module. While CPU-Z doesn't actually report this, we reached out to G.Skill who informed us that this kit uses a single rank design.

DDR5 Memory Scaling on Alder Lake CPU Performance, Short Form
POST A COMMENT

82 Comments

View All Comments

  • Makaveli - Thursday, December 23, 2021 - link

    I'd have to agree I'm not sure about the component choices here. Tech spot same article today provide alittle more useful information when it comes to games.

    https://www.techspot.com/review/2387-ddr4-vs-ddr5/
    Reply
  • Notmyusualid - Thursday, December 23, 2021 - link

    I'd have to disagree.

    7 of the top 10 GPUs in usage on this months Steam H/W survey are all deployed with Nvidia's Pascal architecture.

    So clearly, for most gamers, the results contained here are relevant.

    As to your other comment - my buddy runs 3440x1440 on his Seahawk (w/c) 1080, and it runs very well indeed.
    Reply
  • Makaveli - Thursday, December 23, 2021 - link

    3440x1440p with a 1080 at ultra settings?

    at 144hz? And what games? that comment doesn't have any details.
    Reply
  • mikk - Thursday, December 23, 2021 - link

    By this logic they shouldn't even bother testing a 12900k or any other ADL-S, the market share is even lower on Steam, much lower. It makes no sense what you are saying. The chance someone combines a new 12900k with an old GTX 1080 is rather slim, only Anandtech does this. This RAM test in heavy GPU limit is a complete waste of time. A typical Anandtech test. Reply
  • Oxford Guy - Friday, December 24, 2021 - link

    I have a Fury-X that I obtained used for a low price coupled with a 9700K. Not everyone is willing to pay obscene prices for PC GPUs. Reply
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, January 3, 2022 - link

    The price people are willing to pay has absolutely nothing to do with scaling performance reviews. Talk about a red herring argument. Reply
  • TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, December 28, 2021 - link

    Yes, but this is not a GPU test, it is a RAM scaling test. Running GPU limited scenarios is not going to provide useful data for RAM scaling. Reply
  • Oxford Guy - Friday, December 24, 2021 - link

    It’s fine data, hardly useless. It’s incomplete, though. Reply
  • dicobalt - Thursday, December 23, 2021 - link

    DDR5's latency is higher than 1970s Ozzy Osbourne. Reply
  • bananaforscale - Thursday, December 30, 2021 - link

    Those are cycles, not time. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now