I stopped by the USB Implementers Forum booth, where they had both an interesting non-final demonstration of the new USB Power Delivery specification and some news about the new 10 Gbps USB 3.0 development specification. First, the 10 Gbps USB 3.0 development announcement stipulates continued use of the same cables and connectors for higher throughput, and although there will be a 10 Gbps certification program for cables the USB-IF expects almost all but the lowest end cables to pass without any reworking. I'm told that the newer revision enables 10 Gbps by using more efficient coding and also enables improved power efficiency. 

The standard is in development presently and should be completed by the middle of the year. It will then take the normal development cycle for silicon and controllers to make it onto the market. The USB 3.0 specification stipulates a meter long cable that's entirely passive, as opposed to other active solutions on the market presently. Longer lengths will require active componentry. 

I also wasn't aware but earlier this year the USB-IF finished the SSIC (SuperSpeed Inter Chip) specification which is essentially the USB 3.0 analog of HSIC (HighSpeed Inter Chip - USB 2.0). This is hugely important for smartphones and tablets where the limits of HSIC are already being encroached upon or actively hit with certain 2x2 802.11a/b/g/n combos, and will be a problem with 802.11ac combos. In addition I fully expect to see future SoCs implement SSIC for use with both these 802.11ac combos and faster 3GPP Release 10 or Category 4 basebands where there is a lot of attention as throughput continues to increase. 

Next up was a demonstration of the USB Power Delivery (PD1.0) specification working in conjunction with display driving. The USB-IF modified a Lenovo X300 notebook to accept power through USB 3.0 and the PD specification, and used a power delivery mechanism on the middle display to both power it, and the notebook with 65W. At the end of the daisy chain was a thumb drive plugged into the last monitor's hub which was available to read on the notebook. 

The X300 was running Vista oddly enough, which took a while to enumerate and connect to the other two displays, but did indeed simultaneously drive both a 1080p and 2048x1156 display through a daisy chain with good fluidity for a non-final demo. This combination of specifications is clearly USB-IF's response to Thunderbolt, and looks like a possibly even more impressive solution thanks to the ability to simultaneously drive the displays and charge the notebook over one cable.

Source: USB-IF (Power Delivery) (USB 3.0 10 Gbps)

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • nathanddrews - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    They've gone to plaid!
  • Death666Angel - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    Pro Extreme Speed, obviously. :P
  • Metaluna - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    NeverGonnaBeFullyUtilized Speed?
  • toyotabedzrock - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    PRSpin Speed
  • toyotabedzrock - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    Using USB to connect to the baseband might be why mobile networks have so much lag
  • iwod - Monday, January 14, 2013 - link

    Is this another case of worse is better?

    Why Interconnect uses SSIC ? And not PCI-Express? Is it because it is cheaper?
    When everything else are moving to PCI-Express ( Thunderbolt, SATA Express ), why USB? ( Fundamentally it is still a CPU hogging spec )

    And i hate the design of all USB Port. Normal, Mini and Micro.

    May be USB Spec will continue to get better, I just wish Apple would open up Lightning and use that with USB3.0 instead.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now