Storage bridges come in many varieties within the internal and external market segments. On the external side, they usually have one or more downstream SATA ports. The most popular uplink port is some sort of USB connection. Within the USB storage bridge market, device vendors have multiple opportunities to tune their product design for specific use-cases.

Today's review will take a look at TerraMaster's D2-310, a 2-bay direct-attached storage device. It can accommodate either 2.5" or 3.5" drives, and connects to the computer using a USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C port. It is externally powered using a 40W adapter. A Type-C to Type-A cable is bundled with the unit. Screws for installing both 2.5" and 3.5" drives are supplied.

Almost all multi-bay direct-attached storage devices come with hardware RAID. The D2-310 is no different. Internally, the product uses the ASMedia ASM1352R to bridge the two SATA ports to a USB 3.1 Gen 2 port. The bridge chip also comes with hardware RAID capabilities, and the D2-310 has a rotary switch in the rear panel (near the Type-C port) to select the required configuration. The device doesn't need to be power cycled when the RAID configuration is changed by the user. Instead, the 'Reset' button needs to be pressed for 5 seconds in order to create a new RAID volume with the selected configuration. Tools for attaching the drives as well as modifying the rotary switch position and activating the reset button are provided in the accessory package.

Consumers need to keep the following aspects in mind for external storage devices / enclosures with a USB interface:

  • Support for UASP (USB-attached SCSI protocol) for better performance (reduced protocol overhead and support for SATA Native Command Queueing (NCQ))
  • Support for TRIM to ensure SSDs in the external enclosure can operate optimally in the long run
  • Support for S.M.A.R.T passthrough to enable monitoring of the internal SATA device by the host OS

In the rest of the review, we evaluate the above aspects and also look into the performance of the unit.

The table below presents the detailed specifications and miscellaneous aspects of the units and how they compare.

Comparative Storage Bridges Configurations
Downstream Port 2x SATA III 1x SATA III
Upstream Port USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C USB 3.0 Micro-B
Bridge Chip ASMedia ASM1352R JMicron JMS578
Power 40W (12V @ 3.33A) Power Brick with 150 cm Cable Bus Powered
Use Case 2-bay 2.5"/3.5" HDD/SSD Enclosure
Supports RAID 0, RAID 1, SINGLE (traditional JBOD), and JBOD (traditional SPAN) configuration for the two drives
Supports auto-rebuild in RAID 1 mode as long as power is not turned off after blank drive insertion
Tool-free 2.5" HDD/SSD Enclosure (up to 9.5 mm height)
Physical Dimensions 227 mm x 119 mm x 133 mm 130 mm x 82 mm x 14 mm
Weight (diskless) 1300 grams 87 grams (with cable)
Cable 100 cm USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C to Type-A 30 cm USB 3.0 Micro-B to USB 3.0 Type-A
S.M.A.R.T Passthrough Yes Yes
UASP Support Yes Yes
TRIM Passthrough No Yes
Price USD 160 USD 15
Review Link TerraMaster D2-310 Review Inateck FE2010 Review

Our evaluation routine for storage bridges borrows heavily from the testing methodology for direct-attached storage devices. The testbed hardware is reused. CrystalDiskMark is used for a quick overview, as it helps determine availability of UASP support and provides some performance numbers under ideal scenarios. Real-world performance testing is done with our custom test suite involving robocopy bencharks and PCMark 8's storage bench.

Performance with SSDs
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • SilthDraeth - Wednesday, July 5, 2017 - link

    So, they copy the Cooler Master logo... close enough anyway, and as far as I know, they are not affiliated or part of Cooler Master... Isn't this something that the company could be sued for...

    Or did Cooler Master steal the design?
  • menthol1979 - Thursday, July 6, 2017 - link

    $159 for this piece of crap? With a few bucks more you can get an outstanding Synology DS216j, way better than this garbage can in a thousand ways.
  • ganeshts - Thursday, July 6, 2017 - link

    You are comparing apples and oranges. Show me the case where the DS216j can sustain 600 MBps to your PC. This is a DAS, while the 216j is a NAS.
  • jabber - Thursday, July 6, 2017 - link

    Indeed, sometimes you just want a place where you can dump and use a large amount of data fast. A Synology or any NAS isn't going to do that.
  • menthol1979 - Thursday, July 6, 2017 - link

    True, considering the 600 MBps as SSD RAID0 sequential file transfer only, which is hardly a common use scenario. For most other uses, as you have marvelously illustrated indeed, its performance hardly exceeds the 100MB/s DS214j's speed. This is why I believe that these two products can, in many was, compare. And an entry-level NAS can win.
  • UpSpin - Thursday, July 6, 2017 - link

    Only if you transfer one large file. It's quite different if you copy many small files (which is the usual scenario). Your NAS won't be able to keep the high transfer rate and drop to a fraction of the possible gigabit LAN speed. It's getting worse if you use an encryption. On the other hand, the DAS is only restricted by the CPU of the much more powerful PC.
  • jabber - Thursday, July 6, 2017 - link

    Yeah I never use my NAS boxes for big data transers of varied small files. Life is too short. As direct to storage as possible.
  • jmke - Friday, July 7, 2017 - link


    if you're going to spend money a scratch disk; there are cheaper alternatives with a lot more disks;
  • dave_the_nerd - Monday, July 17, 2017 - link

    So, you don't know the difference between DAS and NAS, and why they are both better solutions for different types of needs?
  • Lolimaster - Monday, July 10, 2017 - link

    I just want a box like this without any additional raid sh*t, just a simple HDD/SSD aluminium enclosure + USB 3.0-3.1g2 adapter and the power brick/optional to run on usb 3.1 alone.

    Nothing extra, just that.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now