For the final day of Qualcomm’s 3rd Annual Tech Summit, the focus is on its Always Connected PC (ACPC) platform. This is Qualcomm’s attempt to bring mobile processors to standard laptops by enabling Windows on Snapdragon devices. So far we have seen two generations of processors, both based on the preceding mobile chip for flexibility. Now Qualcomm has announced that the ACPC market will get its own dedicated chip, called the Snapdragon 8cx. Here’s what we know.

Snapdragon 8cx: World’s First Laptop 7nm SoC

The two previous ACPC chips from Qualcomm, the S835 and the S850, were simple enough to follow: put the mobile processor into a device that allows for higher power, but use the efficiency to extend battery life and the integrated modem to provide a smartphone-like always connected device. Rather than use Android, Qualcomm worked with Microsoft to enable a version of Windows that ran on the chips as well as working with software partners to enable their software on the device – for everything else, there’s an emulation layer if the software was built for x86 processors.

With this idea, Qualcomm was always reliant on two things: the most common software being natively supported, and for everything else efficient machine translation. The best way to speed either of those up is to use a more powerful processor, preferably one with a higher power budget and better efficiency point to squeeze the frequency out. This is what the Snapdragon 8cx is all about. Qualcomm stated that the 8cx will sit above the S850 in a new higher power category, rather than directly replace it.

For the name, c = Compute, and x = eXtreme. Just in case you were wondering.

The new 8cx is built off of many of the same base elements as the Snapdragon 855 announced yesterday, but the 8cx is a larger chip with a number of key features expanded and enhanced for the intended market segments.

Starting with the CPU, this chip has eight next-generation Kryo 495 cores, split into four performance cores and four efficiency cores. Qualcomm states that these are the fastest Kryo cores the company has ever built, although at the time of writing the microarchitecture and frequencies have not been disclosed. (Update: the demo systems being used stated a peak big CPU speed of 2.75 GHz, although we were told by Qualcomm that the final speed will depend on the OEM implementation, so we're likely dealing with a configurable TDP.) We know that these cores are Arm v8.1-based, likely A76-variants designed under Arm’s program that offers some custom tweaking of the design for specific customers. In the presentation, Qualcomm stated that there is a total of 10 MB of cache, but doesn’t break it down into exactly where that cache is, however the system cache and L3 cache is listed as ‘larger’ than before.

On the GPU, the new Adreno 680 graphics inside are only discussed in terms of performance metrics relative to previous platforms: we were told that the graphics are 2x faster than Snapdragon 850, 3.5x faster than the Snapdragon 835, and 60% more power efficient than the Snapdragon 850 (some of which will come from the process node). The new design was labelled as Qualcomm’s biggest leap in performance per watt in graphics technology ever, and that the Adreno 680 is Qualcomm’s most powerful GPU ever produced. This GPU also uses double the number of transistors of the previous generation.

Other headline features for the graphics includes support for the latest Vulkan 1.1 and DirectX 12 APIs, full VP9 and H.265 decode, a ‘high efficiency’ video encoder, and support for dual 4K HDR external displays.

Feeding the graphics is the memory, and Qualcomm is doubling the memory width for this new chip. Rather than a 64-bit wide interface, split as 4x16-bit channels, the Snapdragon 8cx will have a 128-bit wide interface, split as 8x16-bit channels. This interface will support up to 16GB of LPDDR4X, although at what speed we’re not sure. One of the criticisms of the previous generations of ACPC devices was the memory bandwidth – especially as Qualcomm’s competitors in this space routinely use 128-bit wide interfaces – so this should help tremendously both in day-to-day performance and in graphics performance.

The Snapdragon 8cx will support both UFS 3.0 storage and NVMe SSD storage, along with having an additional PCIe 3.0 x4 connection so OEMs can add external controllers. When I questioned Qualcomm if something like Thunderbolt 3 was possible, they said that they don’t see why it wouldn’t be if an OEM wanted to make that configuration.

Being built from mobile SoC principles means that the chip also has an integrated modem, and we get the Snapdragon X24 LTE modem similar to the S855 chip launched yesterday. This chip can support up to 2 Gbps download of LTE connectivity, using 7xCA and 4x4 MIMO on five of those streams. Peak upload speed is listed as 316 Mbps with 3x20 MHz CA. The 8cx will support 5G when the X50 modem is paired with it, however not much noise was mentioned on this given the 5G focus of the first day of the event. Beyond this is 802.11ac Wave support, although 802.11ax-ready support is not listed. Bluetooth 5.0 is also supported.

Qualcomm was very keen to announce full support for Windows 10 Enterprise, and expects the Snapdragon 8cx to push into the Enterprise/Commercial space given the focus on manageability and security that the OS provides. This is the proverbial shot across the bow of Intel’s commercial business, which sells millions of units every year. Qualcomm was keen to provide some performance and power numbers, symbolising better performance at 7W compared to Intel at a much lower power. No live demo was provided it should be said, but Qualcomm is making some bold claims that we're eager to check.

In the videos during the keynote presentation, a number of form factors were shown, including what looked like a Lenovo-based dual display unit and even a Surface like design. None of the partners on the stage were willing to discuss what their plans are for the Snapdragon 8cx right now, and the only inkling of an 8cx device we saw in the demo room was Qualcomm’s reference design, with the OEM they are using covered up.

This looked like a common clamshell design, and Qualcomm stated that they will be rolling out these reference designs internally to employees (replacing their current mobile devices) as they put the final touches the firmware and software.

One of the key metrics for the ACPC market to succeed is software, and Qualcomm invited Microsoft and Symantec to the keynote to discuss the future partnerships. With Windows 10 Enterprise now supported on the 8cx, it was pointed out that Office 365 and other Azure features are now optimized for the platform. Qualcomm said they are working with more app developers than ever for natively compiled software, especially in the entertainment space, as well as native browsers. The company pointed out that it is working extensively with Firefox for an optimized experience.

Given the amount of detail provided (and some obvious detail not provided), it’s clear that the Snapdragon 8cx platform isn’t quite ready for prime time. The net result being that Qualcomm is holding back on talking about specific architectural details, and clockspeeds almost certainly have yet to be dialed in, which means they have to be vauge about performance as well.

Based on previous experience, we’re likely to hear announcements perhaps at MWC in late February at the earliest. While production ramp of devices I would expect in the Computex / June time frame.

For what it’s worth, Qualcomm also had a wafer of the 8cx on display in the demo area. Based on our calculations, which you can read here, this looks to be the biggest a large mobile chip made on TSMC’s newest 7nm process. We're going to see if we can get information about frequencies and cache sizes. Will update if we can.

Related Reading

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • ph00ny - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    Oddly enough on the leaked benchmarks (antutu), it was slightly better than mali G76 setup used in exynos. Of course we don't know how it will perform on the device but the fact that they were that close was rarity
  • syxbit - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    >did you even read the article?

    >This thing is fairly monstrous, at least on the GPU side where Adreno has always excelled.
    Yes. That's what I said.
  • skavi - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    If a 2019 "gaming phone" doesn't have one of these inside, I will be disappointed. This is a chance for that market segment to actually differentiate itself (RGB lights aside).
  • TheJian - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    About time, but still way short. Make it 75-100w for a desktop and I'll bite, providing it accepts NV or AMD discrete cards ALSO :) I'm still waiting for NV to make a 75-100w desktop ARM core with discrete support when desired. Bring it!
  • Santoval - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    That is a server-CPU level of TDP, which tend to have a multitude of small ARM cores. I don't think an 8-core ARM CPU will ever -or need to- go above a 35W TDP, 45W tops. Now, as you increase the cores (not to server levels but maybe to "workstation" levels) to 10 - 12 or up to 16, assuming the clocks do not fall drastically to compensate, the TDP could go between 60 and 75W.
    Not with ARM's reference designs those, new wider designs are required for high clocks and high TDPs. Apple is already half there, though they still design CPUs for mobile & tablet TDPs.
  • Santoval - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    edit : "...ARM's reference designs *though*..."
  • Alexvrb - Saturday, December 8, 2018 - link

    Short for you, but just about right for tablets, hybrids, and entry-level laptops. Which is what they're targeting, and it's within reach without having to completely redesign for a high-power design.

    Maybe if they succeed, we'll see 15W laptop chips in a couple years.
  • yeeeeman - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    So let me see. The SD835 (including SD850) were close in performance to a Pentium Y 4.5W chip (that is dual core with very low clock speeds) and in some cases, were slower than that, close to a Celeron chip.
    Even if this chip is 2x faster, it will still be close to i3 levels, with worse performance in many situations since many apps will be run in emulation mode.
    I think their effort is nice, but until they drop prices, 1K $ for a crippled laptop is WAY to expensive, they don't stand a chance. Also, the always connected stuff is a moot point in my opinion. They are selling a laptop, not a phone, so there is no point in staying always connected.
    Battery life will get close to Intel levels now that they increased performance. Remember that with SD835 they could brag about the fact that they had amazing battery life, but that was a very slow chip, so it is to be expected.
    I think it is nice to have other competitors in this space, but they need to do better and work their asses on the SW side of things to convince developers to recompile all their apps to native ARM 64bit. Only then they will be able to stand a chance in this space.
  • Wilco1 - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    Given that Kirin 980 is already 2 times faster than SD835, it looks like this will be more like 2.5 times faster due to higher frequencies, 128-bit memory and more cache. Besides being faster, it should be far more power efficient than Intel mobile chips in 2019/2020 - remember this is 7nm and using more efficient LPDDR4X. The Chrome and Firefox announcements show the recompilation is already happening, and a promising chip like this can only increase that.
  • sing_electric - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    The pricing of those devices is always the rub: You have to accept lower performance (therefore, productivity to some degree) at the same price to get longer battery life. At Chromebook prices, they'd be very competitive, but you're paying Ultrabook prices for a device that's in the same performance range as a ultra-budget laptop.

    At the same time, I don't think consumers are really the target market here: Instead, its probably enterprise customers who want people in the field to be always connected and who care about security & reliability. For them, not being able to run every app is a feature, not a bug. Plus, chances are their programs are either fairly new & updated (so can be easily recompiled for ARM) or ancient and not (in which case emulated Win32 performance is probably good enough).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now