Caching And Tiering: Intel Optane Memory H20 and Enmotus FuzeDrive SSD Reviewedby Billy Tallis on May 18, 2021 2:00 PM EST
- Posted in
- SSD Caching
- 3D XPoint
- Optane Memory
- Tiger Lake
The latest iteration of Intel's Optane Memory SSD caching is here. The new Optane Memory H20 is two NVMe drives in one, combining a 1TB QLC drive (derived from their recent 670p) with an updated 32GB Optane cache drive, all on one M.2 card. We're also taking a look at the Enmotus FuzeDrive SSD, a different take on the two-drives-in-one idea that augments its QLC with a dedicated pool of fast SLC NAND flash. Each of these drives is paired with software to intelligently manage data placement, putting heavily-used data on the faster, higher-endurance storage media. The overall goal of the two products is the same: to combine the affordable capacity of QLC NAND with the high-end performance and write endurance of SLC NAND or 3D XPoint memory.
SSD Caching History
There is a long history behind the general idea of combining fast and slow storage devices into one pool of storage that doesn't require end users to manually manage data placement. Caching of data in RAM is ubiquitous with CPUs having multiple levels of cache, and hard drives and some SSDs also having their own RAM caches, but all of those are temporary by nature. Persistent caches using a faster form of non-volatile storage has never been quite as pervasive, but there have been plenty of examples over the years.
In the consumer space, caching was of great interest when SSDs first started to go mainstream: they were far faster than hard drives, but not yet large enough to be used as a complete replacement for hard drives. Intel implemented Smart Response Technology (SRT) into their Rapid Storage Technology (RST) drivers starting a decade ago with the Z68 chipset for Sandy Bridge. Hard drive manufacturers also introduced hybrid drives, but with such pitifully small NAND flash caches that they weren't of much use.
More recently, the migration of SSDs to store more bits of data per physical memory cell has led to consumer SSDs implementing their own transparent caching. All consumer SSDs using TLC or QLC NAND manage a cache layer that operates a portion of the storage as SLC (or occasionally MLC)—less dense, but faster.
Intel made another big push for SSD caching with their first Optane devices to hit the consumer market: tiny M.2 drives equipped with the promising new 3D XPoint memory, and rather confusingly branded Optane Memory as if they were DRAM alternatives instead of NVMe SSDs. Intel initially pitched these as cache devices for use in front of hard drives. The implementation of Optane Memory built on their RST work, but came with new platform requirements: motherboard firmware had to be able to understand the caching system in order to properly load an operating system from a cached volume, and that firmware support was only provided on Kaby Lake and newer platforms. The Optane + hard drive strategy never saw huge success; the continuing transition to TLC NAND meant SSDs that were big enough and fast enough became widely affordable. Multiple-drive caching setups were also a poor fit for the size and power constraints of notebooks. Optane caching in front of TLC NAND was possible, but not really worth the cost and complexity, especially with SLC caching working pretty well for mainstream single-drive setups.
QLC NAND provided a new opportunity for Optane caching, leading to the Optane Memory H10 and the new Optane Memory H20 we're reviewing today. These squeeze Intel's consumer QLC drives (660p and 670p respectively) and one of their Optane Memory cache drives onto a single M.2 card. This requires a somewhat non-standard interface; most systems cannot detect both devices and will be able to access either the QLC or the Optane side of the drive, but not both. Some Intel consumer platforms starting with Coffee Lake have the capability to detect these drives and configure the PCIe x4 link to a M.2 slot as two separate x2 links.
The caching system for Optane Memory H20 works pretty much the same as when using separate Optane and slow drives, though Intel has continued to refine their heuristics for data placement with successive releases of their RST drivers. One notable downside is that splitting the M.2 slot's four PCIe lanes into two x2 links means there's a bottleneck on the QLC side; the Silicon Motion SSD controllers Intel uses support four lanes, but only two can be wired up on the H10 and H20. For the H10, this hardly mattered because the QLC portion of that drive (equivalent to the Intel SSD 660p) could only rarely provide more than 2GB/s, so limiting it to PCIe 3.0 x2 had only a minor impact. Intel's 670p is quite a bit faster thanks to more advanced QLC and a much-improved controller, so limiting it to PCIe 3.0 x2 on the Optane Memory H20 actually hurts.
|Intel Optane Memory H20 Specifications|
|Form Factor||single-sided M.2 2280||single-sided M.2 2280|
|NAND Controller||Silicon Motion SM2265||Silicon Motion SM2263|
|NAND Flash||Intel 144L 3D QLC||Intel 64L 3D QLC|
|Optane Controller||Intel SLL3D|
|Optane Media||Intel 128Gb 3D XPoint||Intel 128Gb 3D XPoint|
|QLC NAND Capacity||512 GB||1024 GB||256 GB||512 GB||1024 GB|
|Optane Capacity||32 GB||16 GB||32 GB||32 GB|
|Sequential Read||up to 3300 MB/s||1450 MB/s||2300 MB/s||2400 MB/s|
|Sequential Write||up to 2100 MB/s||650 MB/s||1300 MB/s||1800 MB/s|
|Random Read IOPS||65k (QD1)||230k||320k||330k|
|Random Write IOPS||40k (QD1)||150k||250k||250k|
|Launched||May 2021||April 2019|
|11th Gen Core CPU
500 Series Chipset
RST Driver 18.1
|8th Gen Core CPU
300 Series Chipset
RST Driver 17.2
Both the Optane Memory H10 and H20 are rated for peak throughput in excess of what either the Optane or QLC portion can provide on its own. To achieve this, Intel's caching software has to be capable of doing some RAID0-like striping of data between the two sub-devices; it can't simply send requests to the Optane portion while falling back on the QLC only when strictly necessary.
At first glance, the Optane Memory H20 looks like a rehash of the H10, but it is a substantially upgraded product. The Optane portion of the H20 is a bit faster than previous Optane Memory products including the Optane portion of the H10. Intel didn't give specifics on how they improved performance here, but they are still using first-generation 3D XPoint memory rather than the second-generation 3DXP that is now shipping in the enterprise Optane P5800X SSD.
The QLC side of the drive gets a major upgrade from 64L to 144L QLC NAND and a controller upgrade from the Silicon Motion SM2263 to the SM2265. The new controller is an Intel-specific custom part for the 670p and the H20, derived from the SM2267 controller but lacking the PCIe 4.0 capability. Cutting out the PCIe 4.0 support was reasonable for the Intel 670p because the QLC isn't fast enough to go beyond PCIe 3.0 speeds anyways, and Intel can reduce power draw and maybe save a bit of money with the SM2265 instead of the SM2267. But for the Optane Memory H20 and its PCIe x2 limitation for the QLC portion, it would have been nice to be able to run those two lanes at Gen4 speed.
The Optane Memory H10 was initially planned for both OEM and retail sales, but the retail version was cancelled before release and the (somewhat spotty) support for H10 that was provided by retail Coffee Lake motherboards ended up being useless to consumers. The H20 is launching as an OEM-only product from the outset, which ensures it will only be used in compatible Intel-based systems. This allows Intel to largely avoid any issues with end-users needing to install and configure the caching software, because OEMs will take care of that. The Optane Memory H20 is planned to start shipping in new systems starting in June.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
haukionkannel - Wednesday, May 19, 2021 - linkAll ”highend” ssd are soon gonna be qlc and middle and low range will go plc…
So just wait the things to get even worse!
edzieba - Friday, May 21, 2021 - linkAh, the QLC brigade is here, with the same Dire Warnings Of Horrible Doom that previously fell flat for MLC and TLC, but THIS time will totally come true (or we'll cross out the Q and put P and protest against the evils of PLC next year!).
kepstin - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 - linkIf you were to somehow get one of these Intel drives and plug it into an unsupported system, will it just show up as 2 separate NVMe drives? Would you be able to use it with hardware agnostic caching solutions like PrimoCache on Windows or bcache/dm-cache on Linux?
drexnx - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 - linksounds like the host system just sees it as a 32gb optane SSD
Billy Tallis - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 - linkDepends on what the host system is, and what kind of slot. Only the supported Intel systems can initialize PCIe links to both sides. For the H10 review, I made a chart of all the systems I'd tried: https://www.anandtech.com/show/14249/the-intel-opt...
If the slot is only PCIe x1 or x2, you get the NAND. If it's x4, you might get the NAND or you might get the 3DXP.
kepstin - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 - linkAh, so there's no PCIe bridge/switch on the device itself? I guess they're relying on the upstream bridge of the M.2 slot supporting bifurcating the 4× link into 2×/2×.
Billy Tallis - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 - linkCorrect. The H10 and H20 rely on upstream port bifurcation support. I think there's also a proprietary element to it, but bifurcation down to x2 links is less widely supported than bifurcation down to x4 links anyways.
A PCIe switch would have been nice, but wouldn't fit. And this product line isn't important enough for Intel to make a big new custom ASIC for, either a SSD controller that can speak to both 3DXP and QLC, or adding PCIe switch/passthrough support to one of the two controllers.
Kurosaki - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 - linkMaybe next gen then?...
Tomatotech - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 - linkThe H20 is just a placeholder while the Optane team treads water and begs the rest of Intel to let them release a proper drive. This H20 looks like a greyhound with bricks tied to its neck. Absolutely lovely latency and random 4K performance would be a credit to any high-end workstation. But it's crippled by a shit implementation.
Apple was doing tiered drive storage nearly 10 years ago with their Fusion drives, and as the Enmotus tiered drive shows, it can do amazing things. This is how the H20 should be set up.
I say the H20 is treading water; it should be on PCIe 4.0 but because of Intel's shenanigans with PCIe 4.0 the Optane team are crippled and can't release this drive with the backing support it needs. Hopefully the next model, maybe the H30, will have PCIe 4.0 and then it'll finally be a decent overall drive.
Probably not, given the sad history of Intel shooting Optane in the foot. They could have released this drive several years ago, and it would have been excellent then, but normal NAND drives are improving all the time and it's just too little, too late.
Spunjji - Wednesday, May 19, 2021 - link"a greyhound with bricks tied to its neck" - succinct. 👍