Earlier this morning Apple announced the next round of Haswell updates to its Mac lineup, this time focusing on the iMac. Both the 21.5-inch and 27-inch models see updates to Haswell silicon. These are obviously still based on the same new chassis as last year's models, but with updated internals. Memory and default storage options remain unchanged, but Apple moves to a PCIe based SSD similar to what it has done in the MacBook Air and what it will do in the upcoming Mac Pro refresh. Fusion Drive, Apple's hybrid HDD/SSD implementation (the only good one on the market), is also available but its configuration is unchanged - the SSD component is still only 128GB in size (although now PCIe based). I would've liked to see an increase there. The new iMacs also mark Apple's first move to a 1TB SSD. Apple has historically used Toshiba, SanDisk and Samsung for its PCIe SSDs, reserving Samsung for the highest capacity options. I do wonder if we might see the use of TLC NAND in order to hit the 1TB capacity point on the new iMac. Also like the new MBAs, the new iMacs all gain 802.11ac support - this is also likely Apple's first 3x3 802.11ac implementation so it should be even faster than what we saw with the MacBook Air. 

Note that the new iMacs still use Thunderbolt 1.0, for 2.0 you'll likely have to wait for the new rMBPs and Mac Pro.

Model Low-end 21.5" High-end 21.5" Low-end 27" High-end 27"
Display 21.5" 1920x1080 IPS 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Processor Intel Core i5-4570R (4/4, 2.7/3.2GHz, 4MB L3) Intel Core i5-4570S (4/4, 2.9/3.6GHz, 6MB L3) Intel Core i5-4570 (4/4, 3.2/3.6GHz, 6MB L3) Intel Core i5-4670 (4/4, 3.4/3.8GHz, 6MB L3)
Memory 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3-1600
Storage 1TB 5400rpm hard drive 1TB 7200rpm hard drive
Graphics Intel Iris Pro 5200 (200/1150MHz) NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M w/ 1GB GDDR5 NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M w/ 1GB GDDR5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M w/ 2GB GDDR5
Connectivity Gigabit Ethernet, 802.11ac WiFi, Bluetooth 4.0, 4x USB 3.0, 2x Thunderbolt, SDXC card slot
Built to Order Upgrades

16GB DDR3-1600 ($200)

1TB Fusion Drive ($200)

256GB SSD ($200)

512GB SSD ($500)

Intel Core i7-4770S (4/8, 3.4/3.9GHz, 8MB L3) ($200)

16GB DDR3-1600 ($200)

1TB Fusion Drive ($200)

256GB SSD ($200)

512GB SSD ($500)

16GB DDR3-1600 ($200)

32GB DDR3-1600 ($600)

3TB 7200rpm HD ($150)

1TB Fusion Drive ($200)

3TB Fusion Drive ($350)

256GB SSD ($200)

512GB SSD ($500)

1TB SSD ($1000)

Intel Core i7-4771 (4/8, 3.5/3.9GHz, 8MB L3) ($200)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M w/ 4GB GDDR5 ($150)

Memory and storage options are the same as in the low-end 27"

Price $1,299 $1,499 $1,799 $1,999

There are some interesting changes for sure. I won't go into details about the CPUs because we have covered Haswell extensively before but to summarize, you should expect 5-20% gains depending on the application. The graphics changes are a lot more interesting, though. 

The big news of course is that Apple has dropped NVIDIA's GeForce GT 640M from the entry-level 21.5-inch iMac and replaced it with Intel's Iris Pro 5200. Iris Pro is Intel's largest on-die GPU implementation, featuring a full 40 EU implementation. The Pro 5200 version adds 128MB of embedded DRAM onto the CPU package itself (codename Crystalwell), which helps address one of the biggest problems of integrated graphics performance: memory bandwidth. We previewed Intel's Iris Pro graphics earlier this year and came away generally impressed. It's not necessarily faster than the equivalent NVIDIA solutions, but it should use less power and can obviously enable smaller board layouts.

The previous generation entry-level 21.5-inch iMac used NVIDIA's GeForce GT 640M, a lower clocked version of the GT 650M we compared to Intel's Iris Pro 5200 in our preview. Looking at the clock speed differential alone, Intel's Iris Pro 5200 should be at least performance competitive, if not faster than the outgoing GT 640M. The other big difference is that the Iris Pro 5200 we previewed came in a 47W thermal configuration, whereas what Apple deployed in the new iMac is a 65W part. Iris Pro 5200 scales extremely well with clock speed thanks to the eDRAM, so I'm expecting a relatively good increase in performance from this configuration compared to the Mobile CRB we tested.

iMac (Late 2013) CPU Options
  21.5-inch 27-inch
  Base Upgraded Optional Base Upgraded Optional
Intel CPU i5-4570R i5-4570S i7-4770S i5-4570 i5-4670 i7-4771
Cores / Threads 4 / 4 4 / 4 4 / 8 4 / 4 4 / 4 4 / 8
Base Clock 2.7GHz 2.9GHz 3.1GHz 3.2GHz 3.4GHz 3.5GHz
Max Turbo 3.2GHz 3.6GHz 3.9GHz 3.6GHz 3.8GHz 3.9GHz
L3 Cache 4MB 6MB 8MB 6MB 6MB 8MB
TDP 65W 65W 65W 65W 84W 84W
VT-x / VT-d Y / Y Y / Y Y / Y Y / Y Y / Y Y / Y

For the most part all of the CPU options are pretty good, the only thing that frustrates me is Intel's Iris Pro part (i5-4570R) doesn't come with Haswell TSX extensions. I don't expect this to be a problem for most customers, but it's just a silly side effect of Intel's arbitrary product segmentation strategy. It's also interesting to note that the Core i5 Iris Pro enabled parts only have 4MB of L3 cache, compared to 6MB for their non-Crystalwell counterparts. The loss of on-die L3 cache is likely more than made up for by the 128MB of eDRAM, but it's frustrating that Intel felt the need to ship defeatured CPU die into the Iris Pro configurations.

  GT 750M GT 755M GTX 775M GTX 780M
GPU GK107 GK107 GK104 GK104
CUDA Cores 384 384 1344 1536
Base Clock 967MHz 980MHz 719MHz 823MHz
Memory Eff. Clock Up to 5GHz 5.5GHz 3.6GHz 5GHz
Memory Bus 128-bit 128-bit 256-bit 256-bit
TDP 35-40W 50W 100W 100W

As for the other models, I've combined the specs of the GPUs in the table above. In short, we are still dealing with the same silicon as in the previous generation since NVIDIA's 700M-series is essentially a rebadged 600M-series. The biggest new feature is GPU Boost 2.0, which we have covered in-depth before. With the 750M and 755M, I would expect around a 10-20% increase over the 650M and 660M depending on the title. The 775M, on the other hand, should be quite an upgrade compared to the 675MX in the previous gen. The 675MX had 960 CUDA cores running at 600MHz while the 775M has 1344 cores runnig at 719MHz. As the 775M is a brand new SKU, I couldn't find any benchmarks for it but given that the specs are very close to the 680M, the 775M should be about 30% faster than the 675MX. Finally the 780M should be ~15% faster than the 680MX, although the extra 2GB of GDDR5 may increase the difference when playing at native resolution. For gamers the 780M for $150 should be a no-brainer but the 775M is also a very competitive offering for those who don't want to (or can't) order the BTO model online.

I've also tossed a historical look at the iMacs into the tables below:

Apple 21.5-inch iMac Historical Comparison
  21.5-inch (2011) 21.5-inch (2012) 21.5-inch (2013)
CPU Intel Core i5-2400S (2.5GHz quad-core) Intel Core i5-3330S (2.7GHz quad-core) Intel Core i5-4570R (2.7GHz quad-core)
GPU AMD Radeon HD 6750M (512MB) NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M (512MB) Intel Iris Pro 5200
RAM 4GB DDR3-1333 8GB DDR3-1600 8GB DDR3-1600
Storage 500GB 7200RPM HDD 1TB 5400RPM HDD 1TB 5400RPM HDD
Optical Drive 8x SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW) - -
Display 21.5-inch 1920 x 1080 21.5-inch 1920 x 1080 21.5-inch 1920 x 1080
Price $1199 $1299 $1299


Apple 27-inch iMac Historical Comparison
  27-inch (2011) 27-inch (2012) 27-inch (2013)
CPU Intel Core i5-2500S (2.7GHz quad-core) Intel Core i5-3470S (2.9GHz quad-core) Intel Core i5-4570 (3.4GHz quad-core)
GPU AMD Radeon HD 6770M (512MB) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M (512MB) NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M (1GB GDDR5)
RAM 4GB DDR3-1333 8GB DDR3-1600 8GB DDR3-1600
Storage 1TB 7200RPM HDD 1TB 7200RPM HDD 1TB 7200RPM
Optical Drive 8x SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW) - -
Display 27-inch 2560 x 1440 27-inch 2560 x 1440 27-inch 2560 x 1440
Price $1699 $1799 $1799


Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • kwrzesien - Wednesday, September 25, 2013 - link

    But this is Apples main attraction, pushing forward the base technology to make a great customer experience. We are just pointing out when they don't maximize on that choice to cement that mentality across all options. They do it with GPU's, they won't go too low to cripple performance, we are just saying HD's should be their next target and make SSD's standard.
  • repoman27 - Thursday, September 26, 2013 - link

    This isn't the type of situation where Apple (or Anand) would go for half measures—I think 128 GB is the smallest amount of flash that makes any sense these days. I was reckoning that not making that the baseline was purely a price play by Apple, but seeing as they manage to do so for their least expensive notebooks, perhaps there could be other factors at play. For instance, I wonder if they still have contractual obligations with HDD suppliers and are just seeing those out, or if they are concerned about supply constraints from their NAND vendors.
  • jaydee - Tuesday, September 24, 2013 - link

    Who else sells all-in-one's with under 23" non-touchscreens at exclusively the $1,300-$1,500 price point? Sure they offer better storage options than everyone else, because no one else does it.

    I think the point the guy was making, was that you would hope at >$1300, they could have put in an SSD standard. I tend to agree...
  • DigitalFreak - Tuesday, September 24, 2013 - link

    Tony Swash, is that you?
  • Samus - Wednesday, September 25, 2013 - link

    Repoman, you are delusional. How are the storage offerings "better than any other OEM's all-in-one line up" when Apple restricts you to a 9mm laptop hard drive? Most AIO's, especially HP and Lenovo, use a standard 3.5" drive which come in capacities up to 4TB 7200RPM. Many have space for a 2.5" + 3.5" allowing for an SSD AND HDD combination. Apple is making $2000 toys with no upgradability, questionable reliability (2005-2007 iMac LCD line-of-death, 2010-2012 GPU failures, hard drive recalls (because they mounted them ON TOP OF THE GPU) and so on. All for the cool price of $2000 with support that denies problems until a class-action suit is filed (as was the case with failing GPU's, hard drives, Crackbooks, iPod hard drives, and....just Google it.)

    Face it. Apple has, and always will, make extremely pretty, cutting-edge, overpriced, unreliable devices.
  • repoman27 - Thursday, September 26, 2013 - link

    Interesting analysis.

    When I said "better" (which I admit was overly general), it was in the context of the OP complaining that the base models don't ship with SSDs as standard equipment. My point was that the 21.5-inch models have 3 very good CTO SSD options and the 27-inch models have 5, which is well ahead of the competition. The 27-inch models use 3.5" HDDs whereas the 21.5-inch models only have room for 2.5", 9.5mm drives. Other OEMs make USFF PCs that don't have 3.5" bays as well.

    Anyway, enjoy your rage. I've serviced enough iMacs through the years to know all about their reliability issues (failed LCD panels, HDDs, bad caps, GPU solder problems), about 80% of which were component failures that were entirely the suppliers' fault. Apple pushes the limits on thermal designs which certainly comes back to bite them at times, and I'd cite that for a significant amount of the remainder. However, any rational person can compare the innards of an iMac to a Dell AiO and immediately recognize who spent more time and money on both engineering and components.
  • tipoo - Tuesday, September 24, 2013 - link

    I wonder how many workloads the Iris Pro model would beat the higher end models in due to the L4 cache?
  • Death666Angel - Tuesday, September 24, 2013 - link

    I think Anandtech did a lot of benchmarks for that. IIRC the 7zip benchmark got a good increase in performance out of the L4 cache.
  • MatthiasGasser - Tuesday, September 24, 2013 - link

    I'm looking forward to teardowns of the SSD only version, if there is just a free SATA slot and the SSD fusion like in the former blade slot. Now PCIe. Or if there are 2 PCIe slots and no SATA at all for the SSD only macs...
  • michaelljones - Tuesday, September 24, 2013 - link

    Looks like an inflated (in terms of size) Surface Pro to me at the entry level. Roughly the same price/performance without the portability.

    Just sayin...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now