Qualcomm Details The Snapdragon 888: 3rd Gen 5G & Cortex-X1 on 5nmby Andrei Frumusanu on December 2, 2020 10:00 AM EST
- Posted in
- Cortex A78
- Cortex X1
- Snapdragon 888
Hexagon 780: A Whole new IP for AI & DSP
Every year Qualcomm likes to talk about its new Hexagon DSPs, with the last few generations also adding to the table new Tensor Accelerators dedicated for ML inferencing. This year’s Snapdragon 888 design also hypes up the new Hexagon 780 design, with the difference being that this time around the generational improvements are truly humongous.
The new Hexagon 780 accelerator IP truly deserves a large increment in its IP numbering scheme, as it’s essentially a ground-up redesign of the company’s existing DSP with scalar and vector execution engines, and the recent Tensor Accelerators. Previously all these execution engines were acting as discrete independent blocks within the Hexagon 600 series family, but that’s now changed in the new IP design.
The new IP block fuses together all the scalar, tensor, and vector capabilities into a single monolithic IP, vastly increasing the performance and power efficiency of workloads that make a use of all the mixed capabilities of the design.
In terms of performance uplifts, scalar execution capabilities are said to be increased by 50%, while tensor execution throughput has doubled. The vector extension units seem to have remained the same this generation, but actual performance of workloads will still have been increased thanks to the new memory architecture of the new IP block.
Qualcomm states that they’ve increased the on-chip SRAM dedicated to the block 16-fold, allowing for larger machine-learning inference models to fit within the block’s memory, greatly accelerating their performance. This larger memory pool also allows for coherency between the scalar, vector and tensor units, allowing for the vastly increased workload handoff time between the different execution engines. I asked about the actual size of this new memory, but the company wouldn’t disclose any further details, just stating that it’s significant.
The company’s engineers were extremely hyped up about the new design, stating that the performance and flexibility of the new design is well beyond that of what other companies can achieve through disaggregated DSP and ML inference engines, sometimes even from different IP vendors.
The most important figure for the new design is the 3x performance per watt claim, which is just a massive generational improvement that you rarely see in the industry.
As is usual for Qualcomm, the company doesn’t actually state the per-block performance increases, but instead opts to showcase an aggregate computational throughput figure shared amongst all of the SoC’s IP blocks, including CPU, GPU, and the new Hexagon accelerator block. This new figure lands in at 26TOPs for the Snapdragon 888, which is 73% higher than the 15TOPs figure of the Snapdragon 865. Given that we’ve seen significant changes in all IP blocks this generation, I won’t attempt a breakdown estimate as it’s likely going to be wrong and off-the-mark anyhow.
The Adreno 660 - A 35% faster GPU
Amongst the improvements which lead up to that 26TOPs figure is a new vastly improved GPU in the form of the new Adreno 660.
Qualcomm still holds architectural details of their GPUs very close to their chest and thus doesn’t go disclose very much about the new GPU design and what has actually changed, but one thing they did talk about is the addition of new mixed-precision dot product as well as FP16/FP32 wave matrix-multiply instructions, which allow the new GPU to increase AI performance by up to 43%.
We’re also seeing the addition of variable rate shading (VRS) onto the Adreno GPU architecture, allowing for coarser pixel shading onto larger pixel blocks for object and screen areas which don’t require as much detail or the native resolution shading wouldn’t be noticeable. This is also a major feature that’s being introduced in the console and new-generation PC graphics cards and GPUs, which should bring greater performance uplift for new gaming titles which take advantage of the new features. It’s great to see Qualcomm bringing this to the mobile space along with the rest of the industry.
For graphics workloads, the new GPU is advertised as being able to increase performance by up to 35%, which is a very major generational performance leap.
Such a performance jump would actually signify that Qualcomm may very well regain the gaming performance crown this generation, having lost it to Apple’s SoCs over the last two generations. Apple’s latest A14 has seen rather conservative gains on the GPU side this year, so a 35% performance gain over the Snapdragon 865 should very much allow the new Snapdragon 888 to retake the leadership position.
A 35% performance increase with a 20% power efficiency increase would indicate that the new SoC would achieve the higher performance at cost of a little higher power consumption, but given the Snapdragon 865’s excellent power characteristics of below 4W, Qualcomm does have a little leeway to increase power this generation.
The new Snapdragon 888 moves from a hybrid memory controller to one that focuses on LPDDR5, and also increases the frequency support for new LPDDR5 to 3200MHz (Or LPDDR5-6400).
For the Snapdragon 865 Qualcomm was rather unenthusiastic about the LPDDR5 switch, saying that it didn’t bring all to great improvements to performance or power efficiency – something which we actually did test out and come to the same conclusion in our review of the two OnePlus 8 phones, where the LPDDR4X variant ended up being no slower and seemingly actually more efficient to us. Apple this year also kept on using LPDDR4X on their A14 and M1 SoCs – pointing out that the benefits aren’t all that great.
For the Snadpragon 888 however, Qualcomm’s engineers seemed more upbeat about LPDDR5 and the new SoC actually being able to utilise the increase memory bandwidth this generation. Without going into details, the company also stated that they’ve improved the overall design of the memory subsystem, improving aspects such as latency.
On the part of the memory subsystem, Qualcomm still employs a 3MB system-level-cache in front of the memory controllers, with the ability of all SoC IP blocks to take advantage of this cache.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
eastcoast_pete - Wednesday, December 2, 2020 - linkThanks Andrei! While not the or even a focus of your article (there was no need), I am struck by how stuck ARM bigLittle type designs are when it comes to the efficiency cores. A55, still? Let's make no mistake, you/we want capable and efficient small cores in the SoC, so that the big cores don't feast on the battery all the time. 5G modems tend to increase power use (this integrated one hopefully a bit less), so having the ability to stay on the low power cores of the CPU longer is even more important.
Andrei, if you can, I'd appreciate a deeper dive into the state of the art of the small cores, especially a comparison of Apple's vs. stock ARM A55 designs. Thanks!
psychobriggsy - Wednesday, December 2, 2020 - linkI imagine that there's only so far you can take an in-order ARMv8 core design when you want to optimise for power consumption. ARM do release updates to their core designs, whilst retaining the same name as well, so they do get small improvements. There are no ISA changes for these consumer cores either, as far as I am aware.
But it does look like the A55 has pretty much not changed much in several years, and simply become more and more efficient as the process has shrunk down to 5nm and the clocks have remained the same. I think people were expecting an A58 by now - maybe there will be an A59 to go with the A79 next year?
Lolimaster - Thursday, December 10, 2020 - linkProbably called A63.
Ppietra - Wednesday, December 2, 2020 - linkThis is what he said about the icestorm cores in the A14:
"The performance showcased here roughly matches a 2.2GHz Cortex-A76 which is essentially 4x faster than the performance of any other mobile SoC today which relies on Cortex-A55 cores, all while using roughly the same amount of system power and having 3x the power efficiency."
brucethemoose - Wednesday, December 2, 2020 - linkMakes one wonder what on earth Apple is doing to achieve that. Its not like ARM's CPU architects are underpaid chumps.
Some of it is extra die space, I guess? The LITTLE cores have to be, err, little, while Apple can afford to blow up area for efficiency.
tkSteveFOX - Wednesday, December 2, 2020 - linkNot really. Apple's chips are always roughly the same size as QC and Kirin top chips and on the same nodes.
Just better architecture and more R&D investment. QC have been doing the same chip for 3 gens now, just updating the ARM tech and gains in AI and ISP, but the CPU config remains the same, it's even clocked the same!
Ppietra - Wednesday, December 2, 2020 - linkI think Apple CPU cores are significantly bigger than ARM designs
headeffects - Wednesday, December 2, 2020 - linkI don’t have all the numbers on me but Apple has never had an on die modem while Qualcomm usually does, so you can’t directly compare die sizes like that. Andrei would perhaps know the measurements of the actual core sizes and how they compare from Apple to Qualcomm.
Fulljack - Thursday, December 3, 2020 - linkNope. Apple A13 is 98,48 mm² while Snapdragon 865 is 83,54 mm²—according to TechInsights. Both are manufactured on TSMC N7P and feature no integrated modem. So yeah, wider (and thus bigger) cores design does improve performance, but not always though.
RSAUser - Wednesday, December 2, 2020 - linkApple has both an architecture design leas and a process node lead, TSMC 5nm vs Samsungs Marketing Version of it which is worse than TSMC 7nm.