One of the more interesting elements in Intel’s 2020 set of disclosures was its 10nm Tremont Atom core. Initially used in the low power Lakefield product, this core design is super interesting due to its dual decoder design, which no other x86 core does. It has been over a year since the launch of Lakefield, and we’ve been hoping for a friendlier platform on which to test these new cores, along with some extra frequency to see the design stretch its legs. That platform is launching today, with Intel’s newest Pentium Silver and Celeron Processors.

The new Pentium Silver and Celeron processors are aimed initially at the education market, and Chromebooks, but will slowly expand into Linux and Windows variants over time. Intel detailed that the laptop market was priority over the mini-PC market, however other form factors are free to be developed. These new processors will follow the same schema as Atom-based Pentium and Celeron processors in the past, with quad-core and dual-core variants on offer. Intel has detailed six processors in total, three each at the 10W and 6W levels.

Intel Jasper Lake
AnandTech Cores
10 W TDP
Pentium N6005 4C / 4T 2000 3300 2933 UHD 900
Celeron N5105 4C / 4T 2000 2900 2933 UHD 800
Celeron N4505 2C / 2T 2000 2900 2933 UHD 750
Pentium N6000 4C / 4T 1100 3300 2933 UHD 850
Celeron N5100 4C / 4T 1100 2800 2933 UHD 800
Celeron N4500 2C / 2T 1100 2800 2933 UHD 750

All the processors will feature 1.5 MB of inclusive shared L2 cache, as Tremont is built around quad-core modules sharing an L2 cache – in this instance the dual-core variants simply have two cores disabled, but full access to the L2 cache. There is also 4 MB of non-inclusive shared L3 cache, which is a sizeable cache for an entry-level processor.

You can read the deep dive into the Tremont microarchitecture here.

All the CPUs support dual channel DDR4-2933, as well as LPDDR4X-2933, which is an odd combination as usually the LPDDR4X transfer rate is higher, such as LPDDR4X-3600. Graphics is provided by Intel’s UHD design, however it isn’t stated if this is Gen or Xe graphics, nor how many EUs these parts have. Through the stack we see a turbo frequency of 3.3 GHz, but Intel doesn’t specify base frequencies. In the footnotes, it does state that the turbo power is 20 W for the 6 W variants.

*Update: Intel's own specifications site, ARK, is now listing the base frequencies. We also have been told that the graphics are Gen11, not Xe.

A new features coming to these processors is Intel’s Image Processing Unit, or IPU, which when paired with a MIPI interface can enable accelerated compute for video calls and techniques, such as blurred backgrounds. Coupled with Wi-Fi 6 support (via additional RF), and the goal here is to provide a machine that can enable an education type workload.

The initial devices with these processors will be Chromebooks, which Intel compares itself favourably to AMD's A6-9220C, and MediaTek’s Helios P60T. Intel states a 35% generational improvement over Gemini Lake, and 144% better Chromebook performance (using PT’s CrXPRT benchmark) over the competition. Intel expects these devices to be in the market in Q1. Linux and Windows based devices are expected in Q2. Intel states that it will have 170 Chromebook designs in 2021, of which these processors will form a part of that mix.

Related Reading

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • SarahKerrigan - Monday, January 11, 2021 - link

    Nothing says "confident in our product" like a comparison against a Cortex-A73...
  • mode_13h - Monday, January 11, 2021 - link

    MediaTek's Helios P60T appears to be a 2 GHz A73 + A53 combination, in a 4 + 4 configuration. In a highly-threaded benchmark, the Intel cores would be running at base clocks, which means either 2.0 GHz or 1.1 GHz, depending on whether we're talking about 10 W or 6 W variants.

    So, the MediaTek SoC has a core count and potentially clockspeed advantage. That said, it's a 12 nm chip that launched back in 2018, so probably not the sort of competition that Intel will be up against.
  • lmcd - Monday, January 11, 2021 - link

    Isn't that one of the most common Chromebook SoCs? The Chromebook space is slow to adopt new SoCs compared to high-end phones due to the lower-margin nature. This is a realistic competition.
  • mode_13h - Tuesday, January 12, 2021 - link

    Unless you're saying ARM-based Chromebook makers are slower to adopt new chips than the x86 ones, that doesn't make any sense. Why wouldn't this reach the market at roughly the same pace as ARM chips that also launched in Q1 2021?
  • Spunjji - Tuesday, January 12, 2021 - link

    lol, nice spot.
  • iwannadoit2 - Tuesday, January 12, 2021 - link

    ARM processors like from Mediatek are primarily made for phones and then later repurposed for Chromebooks. I am sure it takes time for them to show up in Chromebooks which also needs Google's approval. I don't see anything other than P60T in market now..
  • mode_13h - Tuesday, January 12, 2021 - link

    You don't see Jasper Lake in the market now, either. Meanwhile, MediaTek appears to be in the midst of a bunch of new SoC announcements, themselves.
  • iwannadoit2 - Wednesday, January 13, 2021 - link

    Intel can only compare against what's in the market. The first comment in this thread was asking why A73?
  • Hifihedgehog - Tuesday, January 12, 2021 - link

    Tack on a pre-Ryzen straw man like the A6-9220C and you can tell Intel is not bringing their A game to this fight. That Stoney Ridge-based processor dates all the way back to 2019 and is, in fact, a soft refresh of a 5-year-old Carrizo A6-9220. DOA.
  • mode_13h - Tuesday, January 12, 2021 - link

    Sorry, what? You expect these to be competitive against Zen cores?

    Only at the same TDP. Otherwise, not a chance. Does AMD have any 6 W APUs?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now